| Mo Monday | Tu Tuesday | We Wednesday | Th Thursday | Fr Friday | Sa Saturday | Su Sunday |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
27
Monday, 27. April 2026
|
28
Tuesday, 28. April 2026
|
29
Wednesday, 29. April 2026
|
30
Thursday, 30. April 2026
|
1
Friday, 1. May 2026
|
2
Saturday, 2. May 2026
|
3
Sunday, 3. May 2026
|
|
4
Monday, 4. May 2026
|
5 Tuesday, 5. May 2026 |
6
Wednesday, 6. May 2026
|
7
Thursday, 7. May 2026
|
8
Friday, 8. May 2026
|
9
Saturday, 9. May 2026
|
10
Sunday, 10. May 2026
|
|
11
Monday, 11. May 2026
|
12 Tuesday, 12. May 2026 |
13
Wednesday, 13. May 2026
|
14
Thursday, 14. May 2026
|
15
Friday, 15. May 2026
|
16
Saturday, 16. May 2026
|
17
Sunday, 17. May 2026
|
|
18
Monday, 18. May 2026
|
19
Tuesday, 19. May 2026
|
20
Wednesday, 20. May 2026
|
21
Thursday, 21. May 2026
|
22
Friday, 22. May 2026
|
23
Saturday, 23. May 2026
|
24
Sunday, 24. May 2026
|
|
25
Monday, 25. May 2026
|
26
Tuesday, 26. May 2026
|
27
Wednesday, 27. May 2026
|
28
Thursday, 28. May 2026
|
29
Friday, 29. May 2026
|
30
Saturday, 30. May 2026
|
31
Sunday, 31. May 2026
|
Mikhail Pakhnin, European University at St. Petersburg: "On discounting and voting in a simple growth model"
In dynamic resource allocation models, the non-existence of voting equilibria is a generic phenomenon due to the multi-dimensionality of the choice space even if agents are heterogeneous only in their discount factors. Nevertheless, at each point in time there may exist a “median voter” whose preferred instantaneous consumption rate is supported by a majority of agents. Based on this observation, we propose an institutional setup (“intertemporal majority voting”) in a Ramsey-type growth model with common consumption and heterogeneous agents, and show that it provides a microfoundation of the choice of the optimal consumption stream of the “median” agent. While the corresponding intertemporal consumption stream is in general not a Condorcet winner among all feasible paths, its induced instantaneous consumption rates receive a majority at each point in time in the proposed intertemporal majority voting procedure. We also provide a characterization of stationary voting equilibria in the case where agents may differ not only in their time preferences, but also in their felicity functions.