| Mo Monday | Tu Tuesday | We Wednesday | Th Thursday | Fr Friday | Sa Saturday | Su Sunday |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Monday, 1. June 2026
|
2
Tuesday, 2. June 2026
|
3
Wednesday, 3. June 2026
|
4
Thursday, 4. June 2026
|
5
Friday, 5. June 2026
|
6
Saturday, 6. June 2026
|
7
Sunday, 7. June 2026
|
|
8
Monday, 8. June 2026
|
9
Tuesday, 9. June 2026
|
10
Wednesday, 10. June 2026
|
11
Thursday, 11. June 2026
|
12
Friday, 12. June 2026
|
13
Saturday, 13. June 2026
|
14
Sunday, 14. June 2026
|
|
15
Monday, 15. June 2026
|
16
Tuesday, 16. June 2026
|
17
Wednesday, 17. June 2026
|
18
Thursday, 18. June 2026
|
19
Friday, 19. June 2026
|
20
Saturday, 20. June 2026
|
21
Sunday, 21. June 2026
|
|
22
Monday, 22. June 2026
|
23 Tuesday, 23. June 2026 |
24
Wednesday, 24. June 2026
|
25
Thursday, 25. June 2026
|
26
Friday, 26. June 2026
|
27
Saturday, 27. June 2026
|
28
Sunday, 28. June 2026
|
|
29
Monday, 29. June 2026
|
30
Tuesday, 30. June 2026
|
1
Wednesday, 1. July 2026
|
2
Thursday, 2. July 2026
|
3
Friday, 3. July 2026
|
4
Saturday, 4. July 2026
|
5
Sunday, 5. July 2026
|
Mikhail Pakhnin, European University at St. Petersburg: "On discounting and voting in a simple growth model"
In dynamic resource allocation models, the non-existence of voting equilibria is a generic phenomenon due to the multi-dimensionality of the choice space even if agents are heterogeneous only in their discount factors. Nevertheless, at each point in time there may exist a “median voter” whose preferred instantaneous consumption rate is supported by a majority of agents. Based on this observation, we propose an institutional setup (“intertemporal majority voting”) in a Ramsey-type growth model with common consumption and heterogeneous agents, and show that it provides a microfoundation of the choice of the optimal consumption stream of the “median” agent. While the corresponding intertemporal consumption stream is in general not a Condorcet winner among all feasible paths, its induced instantaneous consumption rates receive a majority at each point in time in the proposed intertemporal majority voting procedure. We also provide a characterization of stationary voting equilibria in the case where agents may differ not only in their time preferences, but also in their felicity functions.