| Mo Montag | Di Dienstag | Mi Mittwoch | Do Donnerstag | Fr Freitag | Sa Samstag | So Sonntag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
27
Montag, 27. April 2026
|
28
Dienstag, 28. April 2026
|
29
Mittwoch, 29. April 2026
|
30
Donnerstag, 30. April 2026
|
1
Freitag, 1. Mai 2026
|
2
Samstag, 2. Mai 2026
|
3
Sonntag, 3. Mai 2026
|
|
4
Montag, 4. Mai 2026
|
5 Dienstag, 5. Mai 2026 |
6
Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2026
|
7
Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2026
|
8
Freitag, 8. Mai 2026
|
9
Samstag, 9. Mai 2026
|
10
Sonntag, 10. Mai 2026
|
|
11
Montag, 11. Mai 2026
|
12 Dienstag, 12. Mai 2026 |
13
Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2026
|
14
Donnerstag, 14. Mai 2026
|
15
Freitag, 15. Mai 2026
|
16
Samstag, 16. Mai 2026
|
17
Sonntag, 17. Mai 2026
|
|
18
Montag, 18. Mai 2026
|
19
Dienstag, 19. Mai 2026
|
20
Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2026
|
21
Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2026
|
22
Freitag, 22. Mai 2026
|
23
Samstag, 23. Mai 2026
|
24
Sonntag, 24. Mai 2026
|
|
25
Montag, 25. Mai 2026
|
26
Dienstag, 26. Mai 2026
|
27
Mittwoch, 27. Mai 2026
|
28
Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2026
|
29
Freitag, 29. Mai 2026
|
30
Samstag, 30. Mai 2026
|
31
Sonntag, 31. Mai 2026
|
Mikhail Pakhnin, European University at St. Petersburg: "On discounting and voting in a simple growth model"
In dynamic resource allocation models, the non-existence of voting equilibria is a generic phenomenon due to the multi-dimensionality of the choice space even if agents are heterogeneous only in their discount factors. Nevertheless, at each point in time there may exist a “median voter” whose preferred instantaneous consumption rate is supported by a majority of agents. Based on this observation, we propose an institutional setup (“intertemporal majority voting”) in a Ramsey-type growth model with common consumption and heterogeneous agents, and show that it provides a microfoundation of the choice of the optimal consumption stream of the “median” agent. While the corresponding intertemporal consumption stream is in general not a Condorcet winner among all feasible paths, its induced instantaneous consumption rates receive a majority at each point in time in the proposed intertemporal majority voting procedure. We also provide a characterization of stationary voting equilibria in the case where agents may differ not only in their time preferences, but also in their felicity functions.